"Fight the good fight
of the faith, lay hold on the life eternal, whereunto thou wast
called, and didst confess the good confession in the sight of
many witnesses" (1 Tim. 6:12).
"I have fought the good fight, I have finished the course, I
have kept the faith" (2 Tim. 4:7).
"Beloved, while I was giving all diligence to write unto you
of our common salvation, I was constrained to write unto you
exhorting you to contend earnestly for the faith which was once
for all delivered unto the saints" (Jude 3).
"I know where thou dwellest, even where Satan's throne is;
and thou holdest fast my name, and didst not deny my faith, even
in the days of Antipas my witness, my faithful one, who was
killed among you, where Satan dwelleth" (Rev. 2:13).
These are four passages out of
a considerable number in the New Testament which contain the same
phrase. I have jotted down some twenty-seven or twenty-eight of
such passages, and there are probably more. The phrase that
occurs in them all is this phrase - "the faith".
"Fight the good fight of the faith": "I have kept
the faith": "Contend earnestly for the faith."
Now, wherever that phrase
occurs, you will not have to look far for the element of
conflict. You will find that conflict is almost invariably
associated with that phrase - "the faith". That is to
say, the two things always go together in the New Testament, and
in true spiritual experience - the fight and the faith, or the
faith and the fight. "Fight the good fight of the
faith": "Contend earnestly for the faith": "I
have fought... I have kept the faith." Thus, although it
will not always be as precisely stated as that, I repeat, that
you will not have to look far in the context for the element of
conflict when "the faith" is in view.
Of course, that may not be very
surprising. It is the sort of thing you would naturally expect to
find when anything like a new faith which might be a rival faith
to other faiths was being introduced.
The Faith Not
a System of Teaching
But if you look carefully at
the matter here in the New Testament, you will find that it is
something more than that. The conflict is not occasioned just
because another faith which is a rival to existing faiths has
been introduced. It is rather in the very nature and essence of
this thing that is called "the faith" that the element
exists which sets up this terrific conflict. It is something more
than just a new religion coming in to challenge and attempt to
oust other religions. There is something about this faith which
is far more than that, and to grasp and understand what that
something more is should be of tremendous help to the Lord's
The fact is that the very
presence in this world of those who do truly, in a real New
Testament way, stand in the faith and have the faith in them -
apart from all their framework and form of religion - even
without their saying anything about it - constitutes a
conflicting factor in the world, and they become centres of
spiritual warfare. What I mean is, that you need not announce
that you are a Christian, and you certainly need not state your
Christian beliefs, in order to be the focal point of antagonism.
If you are really in the good of what is meant by "the
faith", you are a centre of antagonism. You cannot help it.
To try to avoid it is to destroy that essential of the faith.
Thus, in the beginning, the
faith was not a system of doctrine or teaching. It was not a
number of tenets and truths, but it was a single, though
all-inclusive, truth which carried with it a spiritual impact,
altogether apart from the defining of that truth.
The New Testament has a
wonderful way of summing up everything in very short sentences.
We have several of these. For instance, everything at the
beginning was gathered into two words - "the way". They
were said to be people of "the way". It became a name
for them. Or again - "the Name"; everything is gathered
into that. Again and again it was the Name. They were commanded
"not to teach in this name" (Acts 5:28). They went
forth "for the sake of the name" (3 John 7). On many
occasions we have it all summarised in that way. It is the Name;
very terse, but tremendously significant, boundlessly full: but
just two words - "the Name". Or again, on many
occasions it is called "the testimony". "Even as
the testimony of Christ was confirmed in you" (1 Cor. 1:6);
or, as we are so familiar with it in the book of the Revelation -
"the testimony of Jesus".
Let me repeat.
That was not a systematised doctrine in the first place, a form
of teaching, an interpretation of truth. It was something very
much more than that, gathered all into very simple, very brief
phrases - the Way, the Name, the Testimony, or the Faith. You
would be interested and helped if you just went and turned up
each of these passages in which this phrase "the faith"
occurs and looked at the context.
Well, our point
for the moment is this, that there at the beginning the faith was
not a doctrine, not something which began and ended with an
assent to a statement of truth, even about the Lord Jesus. It was
not an embracing of Christianity, an embracing of Christian
truth, an embracing of the Christian position. Such phrases have
come to mean no more than becoming associated with Christianity
and Christians, and subscribing to what they believe.
Faith a Spiritual Reality in Terms of Experience
Oh no, it was not
that, it was something deeper than that. It was a spiritual
reality in terms of an experience. The Faith was an experience:
the Name was an experience: the Testimony was an experience: the
Way was an experience. Beloved, I want to stress that just for a
moment, because, while we are not going to make everything of our
experience, everything of Christ has to be an experience.
Everything that is true of the Lord Jesus as He stands in
relation to us has to have its counterpart in us an experience.
His birth has to be an experience, not merely an historical fact.
His baptism has to be an experience, on the death side, the
burial, the resurrection. It is something that has to be done in
us. We have to know in our own history; not in the history of the
Lord Jesus, not in the book which is the history of Christ, but
in our own history. All has to be as something through which we
have passed in a living experience. We have to know that He died;
that death has to have a registration in our history as something
through which we have gone with Him. So also His resurrection; it
is to be an experience.
Think you that the
coming again of the Lord Jesus is going to be just an historic
event in an objective form? While all is true of the Lord Jesus
in an historical way, that is not enough for the Church, that is
not enough for us. No, His coming again, while it will be
actually objective, historical, will be an experience, wrought in
the very life, heart and nature of those who are joined with Him.
He is not only coming to be manifested in glory, but He is coming
to be glorified in the saints (2 Thess. 1:10). Not only
objective, but subjective, is the coming of the Lord.
And all other
things that are true about Him have to take that character. What
a vast difference it would have made from the beginning if the
truth of the Church, the Body of Christ, had been kept there. If
only all the Lord's people had realised from the beginning, and
realised today, that the Church is an experience and not a
doctrine. The Body of Christ is an experience, something that
goes through you and through which you go. I mean this: in the
beginning they had no doctrine of the Body of Christ at all, no
teaching about the Church but they had the Church. And how did
they have it? I sometimes think they had it in a much more living
way than it has been had since the doctrine came. They were in
this world as a company of those who stood in isolation from the
world; they were Christians, and all the rest of the world were
not Christians. There were only two kinds of people on the earth,
namely, Christians and non-Christians, and because the Christians
were in a minority, and were just a people by themselves, they
desperately needed one another. It was a matter of life and death
to them whether they had fellowship with other Christians. They
could not live without one another. That was the Church. It was
If all Christians
today were unable to live without one another, what a different
situation there would be! If only all such realised they belong
to the Lord and all the others do not, and that this is the one
great difference to be taken account of - You are in Christ or
you are not in Christ, and, if you are in Christ, you cannot live
without your fellow-members in Christ, you must have one another.
If that were true, we would have the Church, the Body, in
reality. That is what I mean by saying it is an experience;
something wrought at the very heart of us that is really the
Church. Would to God we could just step right back there where,
because we were so necessary to one another, we could never
harbour a spirit of criticism toward one another, because we
would be doing ourselves as great an injury as we would be doing
to the one criticised. That is an experience.
Now, the faith is
that: it is a spiritual reality. The testimony is that; not a
doctrine, a teaching, in the first place, but a living
experience. It is something which carries with it a power, a
spiritual power, and that power registers itself against opposing
powers, without any terms, without any phraseology.
The Faith a
Then it resolves
itself into two things. Firstly, it resolves itself into a
spiritual position. The faith is more than a doctrine; it is a
spiritual position. Those who are in the faith, and of the faith,
are a people who occupy a position which is recognised by all the
spiritual intelligences which are in another position, and,
because they occupy that position, they are marked out, and
without inviting it they know what spiritual conflict is. Their
very position brings that upon them.
By way of
illustration in the type, the antagonism of the nations toward
Israel of old was simply because of Israel's spiritual position.
They represented a heavenly position as apart from this world, as
in union with God and His Christ, and ultimate supremacy was
bound up, not with them just in a people, but with them as a
people in the spiritual position which they held. When they lost
their spiritual position, the destiny was suspended, the
realisation of the purpose was made impossible. But, while they
preserved the spiritual position, that, in itself, brought
everything against them. You might have said, Well, these people,
somehow or other, are the most provocative people in the world;
somehow or other they stir up trouble wherever they go! That may
be said to their disadvantage, to their discredit, but the fact
is that they could not help themselves. It was not that they were
inviting hostility, but their very position precipitated it, and
brought it upon them.
And we must
recognise that there is something even more in the antitype than
in the type; I mean in the case of the Church. The Church is a
far more spiritual thing than was Israel on the earth. The Church
is a far more heavenly thing in reality than was that which was
only heavenly in type, and we shall be very provocative people if
we are in the faith. I mean that we shall be the cause of
trouble; there will be spontaneous antagonism. We shall not have
to be awkward people who cannot get on with anybody. We shall be
here as a challenge, and we shall not be able to avoid or evade
spiritual conflict. It becomes spontaneous.
It is like that in
the type. You remember the smitten rock, the waters gushing out,
and the Psalm "Spring up, O well" (Num. 21:17) - a
foreshadowing of the Holy Spirit coming in fulness into the life
of the Lord's people. What is the next thing? "Then came
Amalek, and fought with Israel" (Ex. 17:8). There is nothing
between. "Spring up, O well": that is one phase. The
next phase is, "Then came Amalek, and fought..."
Pentecost, then persecution! The Spirit, then the wilderness and
the Devil! It is always like that. A spiritual position
precipitates spiritual conflict, and the faith was always in that
very atmosphere and realm. Every time you have the faith, you
have the fight. It is a position.
The Faith a
But of course it
is also another thing. It is a nature. A kind of being has come
into God's universe which is not welcome, the universe being as
it is. To spoil that kind, to change that nature, will be the one
object of those antagonistic forces; to bring down from the
position by corrupting, polluting, tainting, changing the nature
if possible. That was the enemy's objective in and with the very
Son of God Himself in the wilderness; to get Him to forsake His
exalted position by coming down on to another level of life and
The faith, then,
represents a kind of people who must be got rid of, if possible,
anyhow: and therein lies the conflict. So the faith is not just a
subject preached or taught; it is a power let loose. That is the
faith - a power let loose. Paul says, "I have fought the
good fight... I have kept the faith"; and he exhorts Timothy
to "fight the good fight of the faith". The article
occurring three times in that statement is impressive -
"Fight the good fight of the faith, lay hold
on the eternal life".
of Sonship the Heart of the Faith
This is something
specific, unique, peculiar in God's universe, which marks out
those associated with it as being different in position and
nature, and we must get closer to this, with regard to what the
faith was and is. I think the best point at which we can approach
it and get help is to note just where the fight came to light. I
do not mean where the fight began; it began long, long centuries
before this. It began in the Garden; it began perhaps even before
the Garden. But, while it was there all the time right through
the ages, it came to light in its nature and meaning at a certain
point. The Lord Jesus dragged it out into the light by coming
Himself, by Himself being present.
In Luke 4 we have
the point at which the fight came most clearly to light, and it
is couched in this interrogation repeated by the enemy - "If
thou be the Son of God..." The occasion was a battle in the
wilderness between Christ and Satan, the battle of all the ages
now joined in its fullest and deepest and most malignant sense,
and that battle is concentrated in this word - "If thou be
the Son of God..."
What then, is
"the faith"? It is gathered into that phrase "the
Son of God". Now, Jesus Christ as the Son of God - that is,
the deity of Christ - may be a tenet of the Christian faith, a
part of Christian doctrine; but oh, it is something more than
that! It is something around which this battle has raged in
unabated fury. It is the occasion of all the conflict. Jesus, the
Son of God: that is "the faith". That is something far
more than a statement. I have said it is an experience. Sonship
is something immense in God's thought, and it is upon this whole
question of sonship that the battle rages, both in His case and
in ours. If you want to know what the occasion of all the trouble
is, it is gathered into one word - sonship; all that that means
with God, both for the Lord Jesus and for the many sons whom He
is bringing to glory. That word "sonship" carries with
it everything that stirs and rouses hell to its depths, and
explains all the trouble, all the suffering, all the conflict. It
came to light on that point. There had been an announcement made
from heaven - "This is my beloved Son" (Luke 3:22).
Then, into the wilderness, and to the challenge - "If thou
be the Son..." And so intense was the spiritual conflict in
the wilderness that angels had to be sent from heaven to minister
Well, we may know
just a little bit about that. Have you never known spiritual
conflict which has made it necessary for the Lord to minister
life to you in such a way that, but for it, you could not go on.
That ofttimes is the effect of spiritual conflict. His, of
course, was an experience far beyond ours, but we share that, and
the focal point of it all is just the same in our case as in His
- although He was the consummate centre of it all - sonship.
"If thou be the Son..."
In that challenge
and that language, there is a recognition of the uniqueness of
this Sonship. What I mean is this: One of the strategic, cunning,
subtle methods of Satan, to deal with this whole matter to its
nullification, is to propagate the doctrine of the universal
sonship of mankind. You can hear it on the wireless almost any
morning you like. We are all God's sons, if we will look deep
enough into our own natures. All we have to do is to turn inward
and go deep and we shall find God! Then, by the holy exercises of
prayer and the sacraments, we will bring God up out of the depth of
our own natures, and bringing Him up, we shall have fellowship
with Him! That is the stuff that is preached worldwide today. It
is a clever move of the Devil's to get rid of this unique element
in sonship, that it is something peculiar, particular, unique.
There is no Divine continuity in man. That has been severed, and
only by a miracle can union with God be recovered. But Satan, you
see, by his false doctrine, and doctrine of demons, has sought to
subvert the truth. Is it not of that that Paul says to Timothy,
"...in later times some shall fall away from the faith,
giving heed to seducing spirits and doctrines of demons" (1
Tim. 4:1)? Of course, on the face of it, that sounds terrible:
they must surely be very terrible doctrines. No, they are very
lovely doctrines! One of them is this doctrine that you have God
in you by nature and, if only you will turn into your own heart,
you will find God and you can bring Him up by holy exercises,
and, if you will but habituate yourself to this practice, you
yourself will become Divine. A lovely doctrine, swallowed by the
multitude, but a doctrine of demons! It is the Satanic move to
get rid of this unique nature of sonship, because that is
something apart in God's universe. Satan cannot touch that; it is
something outside of his realm, it is unique. "If thou be
the Son...". "The Son" and "the faith"
represent something exclusive. In refuting one error I am not
going to fall into another. Even by being born anew we are not
made sons of God in the sense that Christ was the "only
begotten" of the Father. We do not partake of deity, but we
are made children of God in a sense that is not true of men
generally by nature.
In this challenge
- "If thou be the Son..." - there is not only
recognition of the uniqueness of sonship, but there is the
realisation that in that sonship there is a challenge. There is
not much challenge to Satan in this other doctrine of the
continuity of the Divine in man! But in this sonship of Christ,
and of those who are begotten of God, in whom, as Paul says to
the Galatians, the Spirit of His Son is ("God sent forth the
Spirit of his Son into our hearts" Gal. 4:6), there is a
tremendous challenge to Satan, and that is why Satan assailed in
this way, and does assail. He would seek in some way to
neutralize the spiritual reality of sonship, because it is such a
challenge and threatening menace to him and his kingdom.
Paul makes it
perfectly clear in Romans 8 that, when the time comes that the
sons of God are manifested, then the curse will forever be
nullified; that is, all the work of Satan will be destroyed with
the manifestation of the sons of God.
The Nature of
the Challenge - Destiny Bound up with Sonship
Well, there is a
challenge in sonship, because in that sonship there is all that
is included in the destiny of Satan and the destiny of Christ.
Satan's destiny is a dark and terrible one: Christ's destiny and
the destiny of His own is a glorious one. But these two destinies
are not just automatic, they are spiritual. Sonship is something
which means a full attainment to a certain relationship and a
It is very
interesting to note the different usages in the New Testament
between the word "child" and "son"; child
being one born, son being the child a grown up, coming to
maturity. The son, meaning a full-grown one, is sometimes used in
this very connection of which we have spoken; meaning that those
given to doing evil have come to full growth in it; and you will
see that is exactly what happened with the Jews and with Israel
in the days of the Lord Jesus. I do not want to become too detailed,
but I just indicate it. When the Lord Jesus was speaking to the
rulers and the heads of the Jewish nation who were so opposed to
Him, He did not speak to them as being children of the Devil, but
called them sons. He used the word about them which meant that
they were something more than just offspring. They had come to a
far measure of maturity in their devilish relationship and work,
and when that sonship came to fulness, then Israel is dealt with,
judged and cut off.
In the same way,
when born from above, we become children of God, and are sons
potentially, and when sonship in relation to God has come to full
maturity, then the issue is glory, full deliverance. The whole
situation is changed with sonship.
Now Satan and his
kingdom are coming to that place where the final judgment rests
upon the final development of his iniquity. It is sonship in
principle. The Old Testament description that answers to it is
'the cup of iniquity being full.' That is only another simile. It
is coming to fulness. Sonship, on the side of evil and iniquity,
means iniquity full-grown, over-flowing, mature - destruction.
On the other hand,
sonship in relation to the Lord, being brought to maturity, means
the hour of the Church's maturity, Christ coming to fulness in
the saints - "till we all attain unto the unity of the
faith... unto a full-grown man" (Eph. 4:13); Christ coming to
maturity in His saints. And then what? Well, just the opposite of
the destiny of Satan. That is destruction, and this is glory.
The two destinies
are bound up, let me repeat, not with some mechanical thing, but
with a spiritual nature and development called sonship, and Satan
recognises the destiny of sonship, and that is why he challenges
it. "If thou be the Son..."
So, the heart and
the essence of the faith is the significance of sonship. When
again you hear or think of "the faith", always remember
in the first place that "the faith" is what Jesus
Christ is in the uniqueness of sonship; and, so far as we are
concerned, "the faith" is what we are in Him in the
uniqueness of sonship. I am not touching upon His deity. Do not
misunderstand me in that. That is a sonship of His in which we
have no part, in so far as that sonship means deity, but the
relationship with God in terms of sonship is shared by us with
Him. He is the Heir. "God... hath at the end of these days
spoken unto us in his Son, whom he appointed heir of all
things" (Heb. 1:2). And then, we are "heirs of God, and
joint heirs with Christ" (Rom. 8:17). The principle of
sonship is the heart and essence of the faith.
We will leave it
there for the time being. But I can say once more that it is in
this that the born-anew ones are unique in God's universe, this
is what separates them from all others, and with which so great a
destiny is bound up. It is upon this that all the conflict rests,
and around it all the battle rages. It is because of this we
suffer. Do you want less conflict? You can have it at the expense
and the meaning of your sonship. If you will not go right on to
full growth, you can have a very much easier time, but if you are
going right on, you may have the worst time. You are going to
know more than any others what spiritual conflict is. You cannot
get out of it. Demas evidently found things too hard. "Demas
hath forsaken me, having loved this present world" (2 Tim.
4:10). Well, Demas goes back, but those who go on do so by having
to accept what Demas found himself unable to accept - an
It is not a very
comfortable message, but there are the facts. But let us remind
ourselves that, if we suffer with Him, we shall reign together
with Him (2 Tim. 2:12).